2020 Election, Free but not Fair

With great reluctance I voted again for Trump. Yes I am a racist, xenophobe, war monger, privileged, upper middle class, despicable, etc. person.

What I am not is a person who thinks the elite politicians on both sides of the aisle have all the answers. They have led us to underestimate the threat of our foes, China-Russia-Iran-etc. for decades. They have refused to compromise thus allowing law to be ignored and power transferred to the Supreme Court and Executive branches. They have embraced globalism thus penalizing American industry. And more!

Trump properly identified the great deal of anger and disenchantment of many non traditional republicans while Hillary ignored those folks. Trump also through his many character and leadership faults failed to establish a secure base.

I am convinced a more powerful government, a divided Congress that refuses to compromise will undermine the experiment that started in 1776. Ben Franklin said it best, “..a republic madam, if you can keep it.” With all our faults our experiment has produced outcomes that raised more people to economic freedom than any other country of our size and amazing diversity.

We can become like other countries and become de facto wards of the state, giving up liberties and the opportunity to succeed and fail on our own merits. I am not a red dog republican, I have a lot of disagreements with what the establishment on my side of the aisle puts forth. But the alternative to embrace the progressive side is much worse for the well being of our citizens.

The election was free, no voter suppression. It was mostly unfair as the supposedly objective press core waged a four year war against Trump. The FBI was used to create false accusations proven false by a progressive leaning prosecutor. Trump is an easy guy to dislike, I don’t like him, or respect him much. Journalism has fallen to the range of used car salesperson, facts are ignored, opinion is pushed out as news. Sad! and dangerous for the future of our experiment in government.

Let’s remember the second part of the great commission, “Love you neighbor as yourself.”

Biden positions on immigration

Biden policies off his website, immigration

https://joebiden.com/immigration/.  Plan for securing our values as a nation of immigrants.

Wow, now that is as vague a statement of policy that I have ever seen. This is lots of wishful thoughts with no real end point. I propose, “A plan to continue being the place where people who yearn to be free can come and contribute to the American experience.”

Barbara Jordan, the famous congressperson, was instrumental in our immigration policies that I think should be remembered by those who want no immigration, and to those want no limits, https://www.numbersusa.com/resource-article/barbara-jordans-vision-immigration-reform.

“Credibility in immigration policy can be summed up in one sentence: those who should get in, get in; those who should be kept out, are kept out; and those who should not be here will be required to leave.”

She talked about not flooding our country to the detriment of current citizens finding work, or suppressing wage growth through oversupply. Half of those without papers today, roughly 11,000,000, are allowed to stay through lack of action on their visas, or 5,000,000 people.

Those on the left think it is inhumane to keep people in detention centers while they await a court hearing. By not holding them we create an open door at our border; 90% of released entrants do not return for their hearing. Try going into Mexico or any other country like that!

So, Congress should set the number of immigrants we allow based on Rep. Jordan’s goal. The executive should enforce those limits. The courts should be resourced so that hearings are held quickly, thus no one is “caught and released.” People with expired visas that show no exit should be found and adjudicated. Only immediate families, not extended, should be let in. The progressives caterwaul about wages not rising yet they support massive immigration, supply and demand folks!

On to the Biden Harris proposals: The Obama administration separated families, just google it. Criminals in the US are separated from their families. Trump has been more aggressive, but it is a lie that this has not occurred before.

Biden focuses a lot on cargo coming into the country versus people, which is a diversion. Yes we should check cargo but that isn’t the issue, illegal immigrants are; they are trying to bait and switch.

Looking at research there is much on both sides of whether immigrants contribute, or deplete our financials. Biden only quotes that which supports his policy, believe me there is a equal amount disagreeing with his $2 trillion contribution.

The bill he talks about was a partisan bill like Obama care where conservative input was rebuked. Thus executive orders were used, thus Congress abdicated its’ power. I cannot figure out why the extremes of both sides do not understand they must compromise to retain the power they should have.

The first 100 Days: Trump has already stopped separating families. We let in some folks from Saudi Arabia in 2001 without proper vetting, big mistake, we must vet. If a country does not have enough information on a potential immigrant or visa request, we should not let them in.

We must be clear, because someone can’t find a job in their country they aren’t eligible for asylum. If they do qualify under strict guidelines and can be vetted, then let them in, I do not agree with arbitrary numbers.

Every one of my friends who have gone overseas for extended periods must prove they will not be a public burden. Saying immigrants can be a public burden is foolish and unfair to our citizens who need help.

DACA was terminated because Congress refused to negotiate; Trump doubled the number of people to be allowed in if Congress would fund some more wall and other request. Nancy put DACA in jeopardy.

TPS. DED. I would rather send money to adjacent countries to house people driven out by war, etc. There is no need to allow them in.

ICE and CPB: Another Democrat hit piece on law enforcement, rather than focusing on problems and fixing them.

I agree with integration, I wonder how the “Squad” feels about that. If you want to come to this country you should agree to become a part, not form your own little country within ours.

Regional meeting of Latin American countries: How many more times must nation building be brought up, it doesn’t work.

We are mostly immigrants and it is beautiful, and has been productive, and will continue to be. We must limit the number of people who we allow in and create filters to be sure they will be productive and engaged citizens who support our way of life, and not oversupply the labor markets thus reducing wage growth. This would require some compromise from both sides and a lessening of finger pointing and name calling. But, we must do so.

 

Biden policy on reducing violence and gun control

Biden policies off his website

https://joebiden.com/gunsafety/. End Gun Violence

The very first statements say there are 40,000 gun deaths yearly. Biden doesn’t mention the breakdown:

61% are suicides, would those who want to take their lives not do so if there were no guns, nope, this is a red herring (Overwhelmingly white and male by the way). 36% were homicides, 3% accidents (which includes those killed by police), https://www.thetrace.org/2020/02/gun-deaths-suicide-cdc-data-2018/.

He goes on to talk about background checks, which I agree with.  I agree with background checks at gun shows, private sales, etc. What he doesn’t support is connecting the database to mental health issues, which is the overwhelming cause of mass shootings (more than four people).

He calls the following common sense:

  1. Hold gun manufacturers liable for the use of a firearm. He says no other industry has protection, say again? When a murder is done with a knife, or a car, or a hammer, or with gasoline-should I go on, they are not held liable. Doing so would mostly put firearm manufacturers out of business. According to https://www.wyff4.com/article/how-often-are-guns-used-to-stop-crimes/10033021#, gun owners defending themselves killed 1500 people a year versus 606 killed by the police. All of those 1500 were adjudicated as self-defense. Also, 2,500,000 times firearms were brandished, interrupting a crime. No guns, more crime-Chicago has the toughest gun laws in the country and highest gun crime rates.
  2. Get firearms off the streets. I can shoot a semi-automatic pistol at the same rate of an “Assault weapon (meaning a rifle with a detachable magazine and semi automatic).” My hunting rifle doesn’t have a pistol grip yet has 2-3 times the range of an AR-15. So logic doesn’t apply. Having a rifle capable of automatic firing requires a federal license. Bump stocks should require that kind of license. I can’t wait to see gang bangers line up to sell their MP5’s back to the government. He says only buy one weapon a month, no sweat, this is just inane, 12 a year, etc.
  3. He lists many “task forces” to look at various issues, like a task force can produce action, give me a break.
  4. A smart gun is an interesting idea, my concern is that lower income folks won’t be able to afford personal protection, and studies show they want to have a firearm to protect themselves.
  5. I agree with holding adults liable for the use of their guns by family members. I agree with prohibiting “Ghost guns”. I agree with requiring owners to report lost or stolen guns.
  6. I disagree with prohibiting educators from having firearms. Those who have had experience in the military or law enforcement and are certified through annual tests (same type as the police are required to take) should have one, in a biometric safe. To that end, anyone with a carry permit should go through the same annual certification.

Generally Biden-Harris want the United States to be like Europe in this regard. Well, Europe grew up under monarchies or totalitarian forms of government who knew what would happen if their serfs had weapons, their power would be challenged. Their culture is very different than ours. That is why the second amendment was demanded, to be sure that wouldn’t happen again.

Some say we don’t need it now since we know our government wouldn’t ever try to do that, use force to concentrate power against the wishes of the citizen. Really, below comes from their website.

Incentivize state “extreme risk” laws. Extreme risk laws, also called “red flag” laws, enable family members or law enforcement officials to temporarily remove an individual’s access to firearms when that individual is in crisis and poses a danger to themselves or others. Biden will incentivize the adoption of these laws by giving states funds to implement them. And, he’ll direct the U.S. Department of Justice to issue best practices and offer technical assistance to states interested in enacting an extreme risk law.

Create an effective program to ensure individuals who become prohibited from possessing firearms relinquish their weapons.

As president, Biden will pursue legislation to regulate possession of existing assault weapons under the National Firearms Act.

Biden told Robert Francis O’rourke that he would be the point person on taking weapons away from citizens.

Some may say these proposals for removing weapons are reasonable, but due process isn’t mentioned. Will an owner have the right to challenge a “red flag” law? Well of course you say, talk to the college students whose due process rights were removed by Obama-Biden if they were accused of sexual assault-this has finally been fixed but hundreds of people’s reputations have been ruined by false accusations. I worry about that exercise of progressive opinion over my rights.

Lastly: Crime is a problem we need bi-partisan action to reduce. The democrat passed 1994 crime bill Biden takes credit for has put too many people in jail. Fix it. The violence, harassment of conservatives, defund the police, and other sheer idiocies  that Biden-Harris have basically supported through their lack of condemnation must be recognized as dangerous to a civil society. Reform the police-sure, get rid of the racists-absolutely, train them better, etc.. Trump at least got a bi-partisan bill passed to reform the federal justice system.

 

Biden Harris platform section on post K-12 education

My comments about Democrat Platform sections

Biden policies off his website

https://joebiden.com/beyondhs/. Education beyond high school.

I am happy to see the focus on other education paths than a four year degree. The education Nomenklatura has depreciated the value and purpose of other types of education for decades, and devalued those who had not desire or capacity for a four year degrees. Too many kids went to college, were given too much money and ended up without the expected income and high debt.

Biden proposes many solutions:

  1. Invest in community colleges-OK with me.
  2. Strengthen College as a reliable pathway…. What in the Sam Hill does that mean?
  3. Support colleges that play a unique role, OK with me, Trump has started that effort.

He then states this will be accomplished in coordination with states and educators. Fair, but will that cooperation include those who ideas involve other models like home schooling, charter schools, etc. Or, as both have said they will work with the unions that have brought our K-12 education system from the top five to 25th in the world. Or the college elite who are 75% self-identified as progressives. Or eliminate charter schools and condemn kids to low performing government schools.

Specifically they say:

  1. 2 years of high quality training without debt for “Hard working” folks. The failure rate today is very high in two year or certificate programs. Preparation is key, focus on K-12 first, demand kids come out prepared.
  2. Once qualified some folks need support to finish, I agree. Some homes and families do not provide the atmosphere and support needed for further education.
  3. Apprenticeships are a good idea, this smells like $50Bn spent to support unions against right to work desires by most folks. Will this be union agnostic?
  4. Student debt. If you look at the graph of student debt and college costs they ramp up dramatically once Obama came into office. Kids could borrow easily, had money to spend, the demand was high and the supply lower. Simple economics. Tuition free for those below $125,000 of income. Great, freer stuff means cost will go up. How about help with a note on 10% of earnings for 15 years.
  5. This next one is wild, halve the payments on current debt, or refinance it. OK, reasonable, but how come these folks have to repay debt and the new ones don’t? Then after 20 years forgive the debt. The left caterwauls about bailing out companies during times of crises, or leads the charge as in the case of GM and others. The consequence of overbowering is bankruptcy; that should be the end solution. Always bailing out breeds’ complacency.
  6. Other suggestions, some are reasonable, others follow in the same vein of more government control and involvement in our lives, reducing the risk in our decisions thus breeding an attitude of irresponsibility and solid reasoning in decision making.
  7. Invest in the alphabet soup of colleges that serve various ethnic populations. A bit unseemly to me to separate them out for special funds; seems like an election tool to me.

Lastly: Nowhere in this section of the Biden-Harris platform for after K-12 education is the military mentioned. The military should be elevated to equal status. Those colleges who will not allow military recruiters on campus should be struck from the list of federal funds. The Democrats have been notoriously anti-military for decades, sometimes anti soldier. People choosing the military receive high quality education on both the technical and leadership fronts; it has been shameful the way they have been treated after President Carter.

Overall this platform section is more of the same and lots more money for the same organizations and people who got us in the situation we are in today. CHeck out this link from Thomas Sowell, https://www.aei.org/articles/the-unwelcome-success-of-charter-schools/?mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiT1RBeU1URXhaRFJtTVRVMiIsInQiOiI3YUlUUnMxc0J1WG4yT0NESW1LNzhOc2I4amFcLzFZQUFTSld4UktVcFlBZlVJRzNEdWhBallTWkZKYTUrOFZuemczeVFLOUJsMGdTZ29JZHVHR3NhT2g5T1did2s1V0VMSEx0Sm5qN2tNc2ZZZVZ4alhVQjh4MFpvclpJUnRpbWkifQ%3D%3D, DeBlasio and Biden want to eliminate charters. Sorry, what Trump has started seems better for the future. Teacher unions and tenure will destroy high quality education, but they do spend a lot of money and deliver a lot of votes to those who pander to them.

“I will hold my nose and vote for Biden” Sanders and AOC

Why I will vote for Trump.

Click to cop

‘Hold your nose and vote’: Progressives weigh backing Biden  by Sara Burnett and Will Wiessert, AP 4/15/2020

The progressives are not happy they lost, Biden is dancing around the platform, https://www.demconvention.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/2020-07-31-Democratic-Party-Platform-For-Distribution.pdf, by not committing to the demands of the Bernie/AOC group—green new deal, free college, defund the police, stack the court, etc. BUT, they are going to hold their nose.

So am I.

I have voted in presidential elections since 1968, mostly conservatively but not exclusively. My heart hurts over the partisanship, language, personal insults and falsehoods bombarding voters today, from both sides, but more so from President Trump. Those who hate President Trump voted for John Kennedy-an aggressive philanderer and recipient of fraudulent votes in Chicago; Bill Clinton-another womanizer; in past elections personality was disregarded.

President Trump is vain, not a team player, disrespectful of those who oppose him, too eager to use his phone and pen, caustic, willing to trash those who offered their loyalty but disagreed with him, well I could go on. A friend said it best, I vote for policies, not people.

Pew Trust did a survey of the top issues in this election. I will detail for each one why I think Biden is the wrong choice.

Economy. During Clinton’s first election the slogan was, “It’s the economy stupid!” If anyone thinks Biden will do a better job than Trump they are blind to the data. Obama Biden had the worst post-recession recovery in history, raised taxes, raised regulations, outlawed energy companies who followed the federal rules, worked against fracking, supported losing renewable projects, supported companies that should have declared chapter 11, need I go on.

Taxes. Competitive tax rates with the rest of the world is critical for our competitiveness, innovation, job growth, capital investments-the tax changes made recently have produced those results. Yet, the progressive movement class warfare has labeled all corporations and wealthy people as evil. Their extreme left wing chants death to capitalism and the rich.

Regulations. Our free market system must have regulation, without such the evils of the late 19th and early 20th centuries would repeat themselves, greed is alive and well.  I have done business in China and seen those abuses there, first hand in the last decade. Their government truly could care less. The question is how heavy. In commenting on “The Road to Serfdom” by Hayek, J.M. Keynes said,    “In my opinion it is a grand book … Morally and philosophically I find myself in agreement with virtually the whole of it: and not only in agreement with it, but in deeply moved agreement.” He commented also that only in degree of recommendations do we disagree, Hayek on lighter regulations,

Trump may be a blowhard, but he understands that a growing economy is good for all. Income inequality (Including transfers) has turned the corner. Unemployment is the lowest in 50 years, for all quintiles and races.

Vice President Biden has already stated his administration will reverse everything they can to go back to the past.

Health Care:  “You can keep your doctor and your premiums will drop an average of $2,000.” If not a lie, then gross incompetence. The Democrats refused to accept conservative input. They had a supermajority and pushed it through. To quote speaker Pelosi, “We have to pass the bill,” she said, “so that you can find out what is in it — away from the fog of the controversy.” Or the quote from the architect, Jonathon Gruber about us “Stupid Americans,” https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2014/11/10/obamacare-architect-yeah-we-lied-to-the-stupid-american-people-n1916605.

Our lack of bi-partisanship (Go No Labels.org) has prevented us from reforming health care. It is not a constitutional right but it is something that all Americans should have access to quality care. Ask the veterans if they are happy with the government responsible for their health care. Ask the 150,000,000 voters if they want their private health care taken away. Do Americans really want illegal aliens to have access to our health care system?

Progressives do not want the private sector involved in health care. I do.

Supreme Court: Judges should not create laws out of thin air, they must follow the law as passed, not as they and their likeminded roadies would like it to be. Precedent, stare decisis is important and has benefited both sides of the political aisles, abortion recently. But, some decisions should be overturned, such as those forcing people to pay union dues for political speech they disagree with. Much of the law is not black and white but open to interpretation. The Congress has abdicated its’ role in our country with its’ partisanship, the executive and judicial have taken on legislative duties, “I have a phone and a pen.” Ring a bell.

Coronavirus: By early 2021 the vaccines will be given to most folks and the economy can be fully reopened, but the damage is significant. Biden talks about listening to the experts, exactly which ones? There is much disagreement about what to do going forward and what we should have done in the beginning.

Violent Crime: Not much to say here, I don’t have any data but most of the cities in flames are historically run by democrats. No real condemnation of the violence until it became necessary. Andrew Cuomo saying, “If Trump wants to come to NY to campaign he better bring an army.” We need to control police unions who protect bad cops. We need to spend money on conflict training, etc. We need to root out racists. There is much to do but to say there is systemic racism is false. The Democrats are rooting the bad guys on, or not stopping them which is the same thing. Peaceful protests about police issues are welcome. I think MLK would throw up to see the lack of action to stop violence by a small minority of people in the midst of peaceful protests. Einstein said “Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.”

 

Foreign Policy: China, Iran, Russia and others. Trump has a mixed record on being consistent towards those whose mission is to undermine our country and freedom and democracy around the world. In the last year or so he seems to have firmed up and is doing those things that promote the above. The progressives are very, very weak in this area, remember the “Reset” button and Iran deal that allowed it to produce a nuclear weapon without restriction in ten years!! Senator Feinstein said in early August; “We hold China as a potential trading partner, as a country that has pulled tens of millions of people out of poverty in a short period of time, and as a country growing into a respectable nation amongst other nations,” So as China imprisons one million Muslims, monitors half its’ citizens with technology and if you do anything the CCP doesn’t like you don’t get jobs, move around, etc., will not allow you to have social services it you don’t have an identity card from that region, has stolen our intellectual property, …. Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden said that China was “not competition” for the U.S., prompting blowback from prominent members of both political parties. At an event in Iowa City, Biden was explaining why he believes concerns that China could eventually surpass the U.S. as a world superpower and economic force are overstated. “China is going to eat our lunch? Come on, man,” the former vice president said. “I mean, you know, they’re not bad folks, folks. But guess what? They’re not competition for us,” he added.

Robert Gates wrote a book called “Duty.’ Biden was against the hit on Bin Laden, pg 543, “Biden was against the operation to take out Bin Laden.”  He also is quoted as saying Biden has been wrong on every major foreign policy decision over the past four decades, as he reaffirmed during an interview.

MARGARET BRENNAN: I was rereading your memoir before we sat down to talk and you said in your memoir, Joe Biden is impossible not to like.
Quote: “He’s a man of integrity, incapable of hiding what he really thinks, and one of those rare people you know you could turn to for help in a personal crisis. Still, I think he’s been wrong on nearly every major foreign policy and national security issue over the past four decades.”
Would he be an effective commander-in-chief?
ROBERT GATES: I– I don’t know. I don’t know. I– I think I stand by that statement. He and I agreed on some key issues in the Obama administration. We disagreed significantly on Afghanistan and some other issues. I think that the vice president had some issues with the military.

Gun Policy: Well, not much to talk about here, the positions are well established. As Biden said to Robert Francis “Beto”O’Rourke,  moments after former Democratic presidential candidate — who promised in a September debate to take away legally purchased assault rifles if elected — endorsed Joe Biden’s White House run, the former vice president promised to name the Texan as his point man on gun control. “I want to make something clear, I’m going to guarantee you this is not the last you’ve seen of him,” Biden said Monday evening during a campaign rally in Dallas. “You’re going to take care of the gun problem with me. You’re going to be the one who leads this effort.” “I’m counting on you. I’m counting on you,” Biden continued. “We need you badly, the state needs you, the country needs you. You’re the best.”

Chicago has the strictest gun control laws in the country;that works really well. We need to ensure those with metal issues are not allowed to buy guns legally. What is the hold up?

Race and ethnic inequality:  Race. “Let’s eliminate systemic racism.” That chant has been heard loudly recently and in some cases deservedly. But we humans have been favoring members of our own group-tribe, since we became sentient beings. I say eliminate the racists, those whose prejudice allows them to hold power over others. Saying that all whites are racist is, well, racist. Rodney King said, “Why can’t we all just get along?” Why can’t we, because there are people who like to cause trouble, want others to suffer, filled with hate—on both sides of the fence. Isolate them; don’t paint all with the same paintbrush. I believe that is what M.L. King died for.

Immigration: The democrats want more immigration, conservatives want control. Our quotas today are over a million a year. Exactly how many more should we allow in our country? The lack of bi-partisanship and the desire to make political points keep us from enacting reasonable reform. Sad.

Economic Inequality:  This was addressed above in the economy section.

Climate Change:  Our emissions have been going down for 15 years. We are no longer the big emitter, China and India are the issue. We are competitive with Europe with respect to Tons per GDP. The Green new deal is a solution chasing a problem.

Abortion:  Also pretty clear. Democrats want abortion up to time of birth and some want infanticide if the mother wants it. Life begins at conception, us and all other life. To end the life of a fetus with a beating heart takes one without one.

OK, I have other issues that I list below.

Schools. The K-12 public school monopoly has failed this country. Our PISA rating is now 20th even though we have spent more and more money. Why? No competition, tenure for secondary teachers, union rules that force school districts to keep poor teachers, too much bureaucracy, and much more. The L.A. school district recently said they would not go back to work unless charter schools were outlawed. The sign of a totalitarian attitude. Those who can send their kids to private school, or home school must pay for education twice. The progressives want to end the D.C. and New Orleans charter programs that have produced acceptable results and parents overwhelmingly want to keep them.

Freedom of Speech. The last few months, or years, have convinced me that progressives want to limit my ability to speak. The evidence is clear and obvious. If I happen to donate to a movement to end abortion I can lose my job. If someone express an honest opinion that women seem to take less to the technical professions than men they lose thier job. If I am accused of sexual harassment at a college, or in a company, I am denied my rights to defend myself. If I don’t kneel at the start of a game I am abused verbally and on social media. If I try to stop mobs from destroying my business I am beaten. If I am a mixed race police officer I could be shot by someone who hates the police. This totalitarian trend is not rebuked by progressives to any extent. The cancel culture is totalitarian and Jacobian at its’ root, will we see the guillotine come back?

Freedom of Religion. The Supreme Court has finally stated that funds for schools cannot be withheld from an accredited K-12 school run by a religious organization.  The religion of secularism is forced on me everywhere I turn. Covid lockdowns exempt many organizations who could look like a church-a court for one. OK, don’t sing while at church. Wear a mask and socially distance but go if you wish.  The first amendment said Congress could not establish a state religion. Read the following from Wikipedia. The First Amendment which ratified in 1791 states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” However, the phrase “separation of church and state” itself does not appear in the United States Constitution. The states themselves were free to establish an official religion, and twelve out of the thirteen had official religions.  The secularists want to eliminate religion. Never has Congress tried to establish a state religion.

Unions. Unions came into being to protect workers, and necessarily so as business owners abused and took advantage of workers. Today the landscape has changed, a business owner today who does is liable in many ways, legally and loss of employees. Unions however have not adapted. The officer who is accused of murdering Mr. Floyd was reprimanded numerous times and the chief wanted to fire him, the union leader-who has also had numerous offences, kept him on the force. NYC spends tens of millions dollars a year paying teachers that no one will allow in their schools. Public employee unions give money to the politicians who then determine their benefits. I think that is the definition of graft, payola, whatever you want to call it. Illegal except with regard to them. I have experience with unions in other countries and am impressed with the commitment of management and labor to work together, if that happened here there would a bunch of unemployed lawyers. To be competitive in the world we need to work towards that kind of relationship.

The filibuster. The progressives have been talking about getting rid of this in the Senate. Although the filibuster is used many times for trite, partisan reasons, it also a circuit breaker for the minority if all three branches are run by one party.

The Biden Sanders Manifesto. Biden ran as not a left winger and won. Now he has joined the ranks of the left leaning folks like Sanders, AOC and her group, etc. Do we dislike Trump so much that we are willing to move the country into territories and policies that have proven to be detrimental all over the world?

Divisiveness. This is the only reason I would vote for Biden, not that I expect him to actually do anything to fix the partisanship that has frozen compromise in D.C., but, at least I don’t have to listen to the presidents’ tweets and execrable comments on everything and everybody, he is worse than Biden would be. No one seems to want to stop this bullshit, from either side and it is sinful. Our country has had contentious relationships in Congress once GW retired, but, there was usually grumpy agreement over something better than what was in place. I am not a historian so don’t know if this is true, and I sound like my father—“This is the worst in history.” This divisiveness in Congress is what has allowed the presidency to become more powerful, both sides of the fence need to regain their power by agreeing on something.

Debt. Neither party seems to care about our national debt; Trump loves debt and low interest rates. Those of us who depend on our investments to live, not so much. Progressives are in love with MMT, the theory that we can print as much money as we like without any consequences.  Seems like whistling past the graveyard to me. Federal pensions can be funded with debt. State pensions however less so. State pensions are 4 trillion in deficit, meaning they have promised 8 trillion in benefits yet have only 4 trillion in assets. Those with strong unions are in the worst shape, but all do not have the political will, or sense, to make the sacrifices needed to fund the pensions.  I don’t know the number but over 90% of companies have transitioned to defined contribution plans, putting the burden of saving for retirement on the employee.

Small government. The bigger the control concentrated in the center of an organization, the worse the outcome. “Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely.” This is human nature, it hasn’t changed, ever. Our system was designed to distribute power, not to focus it. That concept is proven in the business world, the military-why can’t we learn the lesson? Trump is in the camp of concentrating power to him, the progressives have been there since the late 19th century. Those favoring the system are concentrated on the right side of the aisle.

 

So, does Trump support all of the above, mostly. Is he divisive, absolutely, but it is a large club and has members across the political spectrum. I have a number of letters to him asking him to change his attitude, unfortunately it hasn’t happened. I also wrote a number of letters to Obama as he did things in opposition to the above.

I am not sure why I wrote this but I just felt I needed to help me work out my feelings about the election. I wish there was a “None of the Above” selection sometimes.

 

Living, more than surviving

Words from a M.O.H. recipient about “Surviving”.

Gary Beikirch was a medic in SVN serving with a Montagnard village, living with, and as them. During a battle with NVA force his gallantry resulted in the awarding of the honor. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_B._Beikirch.

He is a friend of a fellow Rotary member who wrote to him on M.O.H. day, and Gary wrote the words below talking about the heroes everwhere that reach out to others. Our attitude towards our situation is up to us.

Dear Friends

Lolly and I wanted to let all of you know that you are in our thoughts and prayers during the serious situation that we are all facing.  It seems that there are so many “uncertainties” about COVID-19 that have suddenly made “social distancing”, school closings, business closings, and a plunging stock market a part of our new “normal” way of life. All these events have affected so many of us in ways we have not experienced before.

We watched a news report the other morning where a father was sharing with his children how that in the future they will be able to look back and say to their children and grandchildren,

“We survived the COVID-19 Pandemic of 2020”.  As I heard him speak, the word that caught my attention was “survived”.  I thought of all the survival courses that I have taken both in and out of the military.  I thought of survivors of accidents, and natural disasters.

I thought of the many times I am asked when people learn I spent almost 2 years in a cave, “How did you survive?”  To survive means many different things to different people…but my answer to that question about surviving in the cave has always been that… “I did not go into a cave to survive…I went into the cave to try and remember how to live”.  There is a difference between surviving and living.

While in that cave I remembered that during my first few days at a remote jungle camp in the Highlands of Vietnam I asked a young Montagnard boy to “teach me how to “survive” in the jungle. I told him I was afraid of snakes, tigers, and all the other “unknowns” that were there.  He smiled and said, “I don’t want to teach you how to survive in the jungle.  The jungle provides us with life.  We live by what we get from the jungle.  I want to teach you how to live in the jungle.”  His answer was surprising to me at the time…but through the years it has given me encouragement and hope as I have faced many challenges.  For the next year in the jungle he taught me how to “live” in the midst of something that I had been afraid of…he taught me how to look beyond what was “unknown’ and find roots and other things that could give me life.  He taught me something that his whole village had learned…that in the midst of something that is terrifying, and threatening that by working together they could create a village..a place where each of them could not just survive…but live…live without want…without fear…live helping each other.  Each member of that village could very easily “survive” alone out in the jungle…but their goal was more than survival of just one person.  Their goal was to live…live as a family…as a village…as a people.

The current pandemic of COVID-19 with its closing of stores, schools, malls…and its warning of staying away from each other has in a sense created a “cave” situation for our country.  It has created a sense of “unknown” and fear for so many…and caused some to react by behaving in a “survival mode”.  Lolly and I have seen so many examples of this in our town…in our stores…as people are hoarding…pushing others out of the way to get the last roll of toilet paper.  Their motivation seems to be “I NEED this to survive!” Their own survival is foremost in their heart and mind.

As sad as that is we have also seen examples of others who look beyond “surviving” and choose to LIVE.  One small restaurant, known for its dish of macaroni and cheese, was forced to close to patrons. However it has set up a table in town and is handing out free bowls of macaroni and cheese along with a package of toilet paper to individuals in need.  Chick Filet and McDonalds have brought over free meals to hospital workers.  Younger veterans in our community have set up a general assistance network to help with picking up groceries, prescriptions, walking dogs for the elderly and those that are house bound. They have discovered that to really live means realizing that there is something more important in life than self…to really live is reaching out to others…to really live means caring for others…making a difference in their lives.

Each of us have been given a very precious gift…a gift of life.  It is a life that can be spent focused on “surviving”…looking out only for myself… or it can be a life dedicated to and focused on “living”…thinking of others…reaching out…caring… to be there when needed…to let others know that they are not alone

As we go through this crisis Lolly and I are comforted by the thought that we are not going through this alone.  There are so many who have become a special part of our life…a special part of our “living”.  We are thankful for each of you and for the important part of our life that each of you have become.  We are thankful for all that you have added to our lives.  Knowing you has made it possible for us to know that we are never alone.

Through the things we have faced in life we have also learned that there is another that is also always with us…it is our God who has promised to never leave us …who has promised to give us life.  As this Pandemic continues to impact our lives our hope and prayer is that each of us will continue to choose to live…continue to remember and think of others in need.  May each of us never forget that we are not going through this alone.  We have each other and we have a God who loves us and will always be there.

 

During this difficult time…Remember…Life is more than surviving…may each of us truly live.

 

America has the most progressive tax system in the world.

What? “The claim that rich Americans pay a smaller share of their income in taxes than any other households in verifiably false” claims an article in the 2/26/2020 Wall Street Journal-“Wealthy Americans Already Pay Their Share”.

The top 10% of earners in the U.S. pay 45% of all income taxes, including social security and medicare. In France that number is 28%, Sweden 27%. If the U.S. adopted the “enlightened European system” taxes on the lower 90% would double.

The numbers: The top 1% pay at a rate of 40% of income; the next 4% -38%; the next 4%-34%;  those in the 81-90% pay at 33%; the next quintile at 27%; the next at 22%; the next at 12% and the bottom 20% of earners in the U.S. pay at the rate of 5%.

If the data is accurate why all the caterwauling about the rich? Is it they happen to have a bunch of money and we don’t? Is it envy? Or maybe the subject is a good one to energize folks to take wealth from those that have “too much”, after all it is only 2 cents as Warren says.

Do some rich people squander their money on themselves, many times obscenely, absolutely!! But progressives don’t talk much about entertainers who do that; or billionaires who give them money-like George Soros; or….. The bile is reserved for those who happen to think that liberty is better than a huge ass government intruding into every facet of our lives. Why, because they want to intrude into every facet of our lives, to have power, to tell us what is good for us. Are we going to say that the all enlightened government will spend our money better that the Gates Foundation? Absolutely not!

Are there any immigrants from socialist, democratic socialist or communist systems who are advocating to move away from our system to the ones they left? A few maybe, 2% let’s say. The other 98% are aghast that 40% of young people think socialism, and attacking the wealthy is a good idea.

Liberty and a fair free market system has raised billions of people out of poverty. Go to Hong Kong or Taiwan and listen to those millions of people. Go to China and try to do something, or read something that the government doesn’t minisculey control. Be a Muslim in western China.

People, look at the data. Please.

 

An Education Horror Show

The title is from a July 8, 2109 WSJ Opinion piece.

The NEA held its’ annual meeting recently with Democrat Presidential hopefuls parading, promising more money, more, more–except results. Money has gone up lots in 30 years and results have gone down. Did the NEA say, what is working, are we spending our money in such ways that the kids are improving? Nope.

They also didn’t talk about Providence, R.I., a bastion of progressive thinking in a state that leans progressive. A 93 page review by Johns Hopkins was brutal. “Very little visible student learning was going on in the majority of classrooms and schools we visited-most especially in the middle and high schools.” Policies discourage discipline. Grossly incompetent teachers stay on. Evergreen contracts. $18,000 per student in spending.

“This is government failure, underwritten by union power.”

The kids, our future are the victims.

We must create competition to government schools!

“Give and Take” by Adam Grant

Adam Grant is at Wharton, was the youngest tenured professor when he started.  He is a psychologist who has done some interesting work in what works in the business and personal world.

“Give and Take” was an enjoyable read, well researched with lots of stories illustrating his points. He talked about how we interact with others, classifying us as “Givers”, “Takers” and “Matchers.” Later in the book he provides resources to help us see who we are and methods to alter our interaction habits if desired. An effective “how to” book.

As a sales guy, a leader in a now large company, $6 Bn sales in North America, Latin America and Australia, I found the book very instructive to assist us in our goals to be more productive, effective and personally happy. I was pleased that some of the suggestions were habits I had developed (thanks USMC), others I wished I had developed.

The interesting take away was that “Givers” reside at the highest level of “success”, and the lowest. That declaration early in the book was counter-intuitive until the research and examples were detailed.

All can benefit from reading, reflecting and acting on the results. The last section was a gift, tools to help us change if so desired. Lots of books shine in research, etc. then leave us hanging on how to implement, not this one!