“Curt Schilling the Science Guy” is the title of an editorial by William McGurn in a recent WSJ. He said that “a man is a man no matter what they call themselves” in response to bathroom hoopla. He has been chastised by ESPN and the “nattering nabobs..”
The article goes on to say the progressive movement loves to use science when convenient. Climate change (no longer global warming, since it isn’t) is science based. Your gender isn’t anymore.
A fetus isn’t a person according to progressive science, yet people have been convicted of double murder when they kill a pregnant woman (was she a real woman, or a man who…). When a progressive woman is pregnant they talk about their new baby while in utero, shouldn’t they wait until “it” really is a person? HRC was recently criticized for saying a fetus is an unborn PERSON, heaven forbid.
Those who don’t feel science can predict our global temperature accurately, or the amount of affect man has on that temperature are now possibly in violation of the LAW, can be criminals, put in jail–Galileo must be exited to have people possibly joining him! Proposing that a different scientific view is illegal proves the adage, “power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely” (Lord Acton, 1887).
Wisdom is keeping an open mind. Is The American Mind Closing?